
After a great success of Windows XP, Vista came up. Unfortunately Vista was unable to replace XP and couldn’t come even close to XP if we talk about its share in terms of use. Still 60% of the businesses are using XP environment because they believe that it works best for their working needs. There are quite a few companies still using Windows 2000 that’s because there are some particular applications which may not be compatible with XP but other than that most companies use Windows XP. Besides this, the world seems to be in love with Windows XP. People want to keep it in market especially after their experience with Windows Vista, and this makes Vista look even worse. There are some reports about people reverting back to XP after finding the drawbacks of Vista.
Windows Vista is out for quite some time now. Vista originally came carrying a goal to replace XP but failed to leave even its own footprint. I have encountered very few instances of a company using it in their work environment. To many, Vista is nothing better than a piece of junk. Vista is being used mainly by either home users or those who use the computer for their home/ personal use because they do not have a choice other than using it. Here in the United States, most of the outlets like Best Buy, CompUSA, Circuit City, Wal-Mart, Sams Club, Costco etc. were selling computers with only Vista preloaded (before Windows 7 was launched). When People ask to uninstall Vista, they charge some additional money ($99.00) to remove Vista and put XP back on (except for some Vista ultimate users who had an option to get their operating system down- graded for free). The percentage of people who don’t know anything about an operating system despite of using computer for a long time is fairly high even now. For people who fall under this category may not have any issues either by with XP or with Vista. So basically Microsoft is forcing people to buy the computers with Vista pre-loaded. This way, Microsoft still making profit whether you take the computer as it is or even if you ask them replaces Vista with XP at additional $99.00. Let’s forget the Vista here but do keep the XP in mind and let’s move towards the new innovation, Windows 7.
Windows XP has been the best operating system for almost a decade now but is it the turn for Windows 7? Many People say that Windows 7 seems to be nothing more than some polish applied liberally to the Vista Aero theme. I would say, please do not jump into this conclusion so early, because windows 7 seems to be a complete replacement of Vista and much better than Vista in terms of performance. Windows 7 is more than just spin. It's stable, smooth, and highly polished operating system introducing new graphical features, a new taskbar that can compete handily with the Mac OS X dock, and device management and security enhancements that make it both easier to use and safer. Importantly, it won't require the hardware upgrades that Vista demanded (at least Microsoft claims it). The reason behind this is partially because the hardware has caught up, and partially because Microsoft is eager to make Windows 7 accessible to as many people as possible.
Microsoft is offering six versions of Windows 7: Starter, Home Premium, Professional, Ultimate, OEM, and Enterprise. The three versions that Redmond will be promoting most heavily are Home Premium, Professional, and Ultimate, although Starter will also be available to consumers. Windows 7 will support both 32-bit and 64-bit systems. The bare minimum requirements for the 32-bit include a 1GHz processor, 1GB RAM, 16GB available hard-disk space, and a DirectX 9 graphics device with WDDM 1.0 or higher driver. 64-bit systems will require at least a 1 GHz processor, 2GB RAM, 20GB of free space on your hard drive, and a DirectX 9 graphics device with WDDM 1.0 or higher driver. A touch-screen monitor is required to take advantage of the native touch features. Do note that some users have claimed to have limited success running the Windows 7 beta with less than 1GB of RAM, but that's not recommended.
| Comparing Windows: XP vs. Vista vs. 7 | |||
| | Windows XP | Windows Vista | Windows 7 |
| Minimum hardware | Processor: 300MHz | Processor: 1GHz | Processor: 1 GHz |
| RAM: 128MB | RAM: 1GB (32-bit), 2GB (64-bit) | RAM: 1GB (32-bit), 2GB (64-bit) | |
| Super VGA graphics device | Support for DirectX 9 graphics device with 128MB of memory | Support for DirectX 9 graphics device with 128MB of memory | |
| HD: 4.2GB (for SP3) | HD: 20GB (32-bit), 40GB (64-bit) | HD: 16GB (32-bit), 20GB (64-bit) | |
| Interface | Luna theme | Aero theme | Aero theme |
| Introduces task-based windows options | Introduces transparent panes, window animations, live thumbnails of running programs | Supports slideshow backgrounds, RSS and theme packs | |
| Skinning possible but difficult | New desktop sidebar supports gadgets | Introduces Aero Shake and Aero Snap | |
| Desktop Cleanup Wizard automates removing old icons | Supports touch screens | Desktop gadgets can be placed anywhere | |
| | | Supports multi-touch on touch screens | |
| | | | |
| Explorer | Replaces tree navigation by default with task pane | Task pane integrated into toolbar | Support for federated searches and libraries |
| Improves image handling | New breadcrumb navigation | Virtual folders aggregate content from local and networked drives | |
| Offers thumbnail previews and group views | New metadata display | | |
| Supports some metadata | Improved icon resolution | | |
| | Some documents can be edited from the preview pane | | |
| | | | |
| Start menu | New layout | Added search box | Taskbar jumps appear in the Start menu and replace the right column when viewed |
| Devices and some Control Panel options appear in menu | All Programs folder changed to a nested format | Documents, Pictures, Music buttons now link to their libraries | |
| | Configurable power button | Control Panel options have been integrated into search results | |
| | User profile picture | | |
| | | | |
| Taskbar | New look | Refreshed look | Interactive mouse-over preview panes |
| Hideable icons in System Tray | Alt-Tab hot key now shows preview thumbnail of program | Replacement of the Quick Launch bar with pinned programs | |
| | | Program-specific jump lists based on pinned programs | |
| | | Aero Peek for mouse-over desktop viewing | |
| | | Revamped System Tray | |
| | | | |
| Devices | Introduces Universal Plug-n-Play | Debuts portable device API, designed to communicate with cell phones, PDAs, and portable media players | New Device Stage provides a centralized, unified window for managing all aspects of printers and portable devices |
| New driver library allows for downgrading drivers when necessary | Introduces Sync Center for managing data synchronizations | ||
| | | ||
| Misc. | Introduces context-menu CD and DVD burning from Windows Explorer | Built-in drive partitioning | Expands Windows Explorer disc burning to include ISOs |
| Supports multiple versions of a single DLL to prevent programs from overwriting each other | More powerful screen-capturing tool | Introduces XP Mode | |
| Introduces Hibernate and Sleep modes | Hybrid Sleep and better configuration options for more nuanced power management | Expanded options for disabling components | |
| Remote Desktop for accessing a computer from another location | User-based file-type associations | Can search text in scanned TIFF | |
| Fast user account switching | Previous Version automatically backs up changes to individual files | Additional power-saving features for laptops | |
| | | | |
The good: Strong design and Microsoft don't always go together, but they do in Windows 7. Users might take a while to get used to the new taskbar and Aero Peek, but they're a pleasure to use.
The bad: Performance is still hit-or-miss in Windows 7. At the ripe age of seven, Windows XP still performs better in some categories.
The bottom line: Windows 7 is more than what Vista should have been, it's where Microsoft needed to go. How much damage Vista did and whether Windows 7 is enough for people to finally abandon Windows XP are questions that nobody has the answers to right now. (source: CNET)










Add your comment because your opinion matters. Please don't spam!
Note that the comments with intention of advertising will be Rejected.
If You Like This Blog Subscribe to my feed!
13 Comments:
Dear our regular blog readers!
I have shared my personal opinion through this post, please do not mind if you disagree with any of my opinions. As this is part of my personal work experience, so please feel free to comment with your valuable opinion and experiences. I would love to hear about your experiences specially in regards to Vista. No offence here, if you like vista, this is just my general opinion and there is nothing to do with that. At last, I would like to thank Mr. Deependra Jha for letting me share my opinion via his blog.
Thank you.
Very kindly
Mukesh Jha
Due to several nagging messages, some hardware issues and it's slow performance, I also down-graded my system from Vista Home Premium to Windows Xp Pro.
I installed Win 7 just yesterday, but my first impression is not very much different than that of Vista, Installation took lesser time though.
As there were some remarkable changes between it's previous versions of Ose's (like win 95 to 98, 98 to 2000 and xp etc.) I didn't found much difference in it's GUI.
I figured out some enchantments on it's taskbar and it has became little user friendly than it's previous Avatar, Vista. But I think people who disliked Vista may also have similar feeling about this new Avatar.
Last but not least, I think it's ever growing hardware requirement makes people to think about something alternate and migrate to Linux and other Oses.
Thanks for the in depth info and comparison table; which will be of much help for users like us to make a choice.
I think this is a timely post, since many people will be interested to know how the newly released Windows 7 will compare against its predecessors. Personally I think Windows 7 is a very good product, and finally it seems that Microsoft has managed to release a worthy upgrade to Windows XP. But , for me Windows 7 is not a huge technical break through, since it simply delivers the stability and security of Vista with XP level performance. After all, it is largely based on Vista code base, so we can’t expect too much out of it.
However I see few problems in the way MS is launching Windows 7. First : the number of editions. There are 6 standard editions, 3 regional editions, 3 upgrade editions (with 4 options), and 3 more editions for Netbooks. That puts the total count at 15! Why confuse the customers like this ? This is the most ridicules marketing strategy I’ve seen so far.
The next is the cost. ! $199.99 for Home premium and $319.99 for ultimate. IMO that is way too much. On top of that the upgrade licenses costs almost as high as the retail licenses: $119.99 for Home Premium and $219.99 for Ultimate. Personally I think Windows 7 should’ve been a free upgrade to at least those with Windows Vista Ultimate. After paying $399 for vista Ultimate why are we asked to pay another $219 just for a performance upgrade?? Pricing (especially the upgrade pricing) is a huge letdown for me.
I m interested in using windows 7 although I have not used it till now....all these words encourage me to install windows 7 as I m using vista till now...
up to now i am satisfied with vista but eager to install windows7. Thanks to writer for sharing his experience.
Will post my view, only after using it...anyway, thanks for sharing this information...
thanks for sharing information and comparing windows.
I'm on with my XP Pro till I total my computer. I don't see the necessity or desire to ever upgrade from it. The ever increasing hardware requirements with each new OS don’t make any sense on upgrading either.
I appreciate the author and the blog owner for posting this very informative post. But, what I am more interested in reading is "why should an average computer user ever need to upgrade from XP?" If anyone one of you find a post shedding light on that regard, please do forward me the link.
Adios!!
That's an informative post and cool analysis of XP, Vista and 7.
The features, benefits and advantages of windows 7 are tempting me to upgrade from XP to 7.
But is it advisable to wait and watch for some time to see more usage among the consumers!!??
I downgraded from Vista on a machine and am still using it, albeit grudgingly, in a few. To say Vista has been a remarkable failure would be an understatement. I started dabbling in Macs recently and the difference is telling. Fooled around with W-7 on a friend's machine and unfortunately it's no SnowLeopard.
PS : Reviews are better when they are un=biased. When you start out with "Microsoft, the undisputed leader in business productivity software..", it does not convey impartial review. Sans for Office & Windows MS has been having a bad decade and is out thought in every aspect be it Databases, Search, Browser or company in general..
Thank you Mukeshji for an elaborate discussion on a timely subject matter!Thank you Deependraji also for providing this forum to him.
Personally, as a home user, I preferred vista to XP because of its stronger security system and smarter toolbar options. I am looking forward to installing 7 in the near future and your description will, of course, remind me what to check in a new system.
i read ur article n now i am convinced abt windows 7. i'll buy a laptop with windows 7 in it. can i get it??
Dear Readers,
I really appreciate all your valuable comments and suggestions regarding my post. It is obvious that we are always ready to try something new. People – at least Microsoft’s fans – have waited long enough for a better replacement of XP and Vista and here we go, we have got windows 7 now. Thanks to Microsoft for making such a nice operating system which is capable of challenging Mac.
In response to Dilip Acharya's comment, it seems better than Microsoft's all previous operating systems. Yes, I must say Vista was piece of junk but again XP has been one of the best OS in the past decade and it is still popular among both personal and corporate users. I must say, Windows 7 has come up with a complete set of features and requirements what we can think of either for personal use or official use.
Thank you Hasitha for sharing your feelings and experiences on Windows 7.
The comment made by Prajwol echoes the sentiment of many especially the PC users. We will discuss about why we should now upgrade to Windows 7 and gradually give up XP, in one of my upcoming posts.
Regarding Shilpa’s comment, I would say yes, it’s fair to give the new OS a try. You will find it exciting and cool.
In response to the comment by Madhu Rao, the statement that Microsoft is the undisputed leader in business productivity software, I actually wrote it in the context of the operating systems.
In response to Nirmal's comment, yes, you can buy laptops with Windows 7 pre-loaded for as cheap as $699.99.
I have myself started using windows 7 and so far I am pretty happy with its graphics, performance and outlook. I can't say it's better than Mac but it is not inferior either. We are still to learn more about Windows7 and will post my next article as I will experience some more about it.
Thank you once again for your time to read the post and comment on it. I am glad that my post was informative and helpful for you guys. I will look forward to share more of my experiences in future through this blog.
Very Kindly
Mukesh Jha
Post a Comment
Please click "Post Comment" option again if the first attempt fails...